PERBANDINGAN PEMETAAN PENGETAHUAN PENELITIAN NUTRISI INDONESIA DENGAN THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION TERINDEKS SCOPUS PENDEKATAN BIBLIOMETRIK DAN SCIENTOMETRICS

Authors

  • Cecep Ibrahim Universitas Al Azhar Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33505/jodis.v4i1.157

Keywords:

bibliometrik, scientometrics, nutrisi, penelitian Indonesia, scopus

Abstract

 

Scientometrics closely related to bibliometrics, which is basically the science used to calculate or map research so that it becomes knowledge information. Social Network Analysis (SNA) is a method or strategy for investigating social structures through the use of network theory and graph theory. The aim of this research is comparison mapping of nutrition research knowledge in Indonesia, indexed by Scopus by mapping nutrition research knowledge The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (AJCN) indexed by Scopus in 2014-2018 with bibliometrics approach and Scientometrics.The research method used a systematic literature review approach consisting of problem identification, data collection, data selection, data synthesis and data analysis. The results of this study indicate that visualization of knowledge mapping of international publications of Indonesian scientific works in the field of nutrition indexed by Scopus with the AJCN 2014-2018 indexed by Scopus using the VOS viewer shows that in Indonesian research, the most researched subjects were Nutrition, Malnutrition, Children. Meanwhile, the AJCN is Obesity, Diet and Nutrition.


References

Chen et al. (2009). Towards an Explanatory and Computational Theory of Scientific Discovery. Journal of Informetrics 3(3), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2009.03.004.

Cheng et al. (2018). Mapping Knowledge Structure by Keyword Co-Occurrence and Social Network Analysis. Library Hi Tech 36(4), 636–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-01-2018-0004.

Haustein et al. (2014). Tweeting Biomedicine: An Analysis of Tweets and Citations in the Biomedical Literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 65(4): 656–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23101.

Karanatsiou et al. (2017). Bibliometrics and Altmetrics Literature Review. Performance Measurement and Metrics 18 (1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-08-2016-0036.

Kitchencham B and Ebse C. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering executive summary. Durham: IEEE Computer Science.

Mingers, J, and Leydesdorff, L. (2015). A Review of Theory and Practice in Scientometrics. European Journal of Operational Research 246(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.04.002.

Otte, E., and Rousseau, R. (2002). Social Network Analysis: A Powerful Strategy, Also for the Information Sciences. Journal of Information Science 28 (6): 441–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555150202800601.

Popp et al. (2016). Co-Authorship and Co-Citation Networks in the Agricultural Economics Literature: The Case of Central and Eastern Europe. Eastern European Economics 54 (2), 153–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00128775.2015.1135065.

Internet Web Page

“(PDF) Peran Nutrisi Untuk Tumbuh Kembang Dan Kesehatan Saluran Cerna.” n.d. Accessed January 28, 2019. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327012375_Peran_Nutrisi_Untuk_Tumbuh_Kembang_dan_Kesehatan_Saluran_Cerna

“Journal Rankings on Nutrition and Dietetics.” n.d. Accessed January 25, 2019. https://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php?category=2916.

“The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition | American Society for Nutrition.” n.d. Accessed January 25, 2019. https://nutrition.org/publications/the-american-journal-of-clinical-nutrition/.

“WHO | Constitution of WHO: Principles.” 2016. World Health Organization. 2016. https://www.who.int/about/mission/en/.

“WHO | Indonesia.” 2019. World Health Organization. 2019. https://www.who.int/countries/idn/en/.

Downloads

Published

2020-03-12

Issue

Section

Article