Research Productivity of Maharshi Dayanand University (MDU): a Quantitative Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33505/jodis.v6i1.190Abstract
The present research paper investigate the research productivity of Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak from 2011 to 2020.The paper carried out various parameters of bibliometric such as total output and cited publications; year wise distribution of research output; most prolific author, top cited articles of the MDU authors and most preferred source by authors. This study found that the most preferred document form is article with 2426 (71.31%) publications followed by review with 383 (11.26%) publications and most productive year is 2020 (15.20%) followed by 2019 (15.14%) among MDU publications during the study period. The study explored that in terms of number of publications, Pundir, C.S. is most productive author of MDU with 169 publications followed by P.Shukla with 148 contributions. It is also noticed that top fifteen authors collectively produced 37% research output of total publications of MDU . The Aip Conference Proceedings contributed highest research output (42) among top ten preferred sources of university and these top ten sources together produced around 8.96% of the total research output. The study found that the article titled “Nanostructured graphene/Fe3O4 incorporated polyaniline as a high performance shield against electromagnetic pollution” authored by Singh, K. et al. published in the year 2013 received highest number of citations.References
Angadi, M., Koganuramath, M., Kademani, B. S., & Ramesha, B. (2012). Scientometric dimensions of innovation communication productivity of the University of Madras: A study based on Web of Science database. In Dynamics of Librarianship in the Knowledge Society (pp. 1120-1132). BR Publishing Corporation.
Baskaran, C. (2013). Research Productivity of Alagappa University during 1999-2011: A Bibliometric Study. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 33(3), 236–242. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.33.3.4609
De Bellis, N. (2009). Bibliometrics and citation analysis: From the science citation index to cybermetrics. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
Kaur, H. & Mahajan, P. (2012). Comparative evaluation of research output: AIIMS vs PGIMER. DESIDOC J. Lib. Inf. Technol., 2012, 32(6), 531-36.
Kumbar, B. D., & Gupta, B. M. (2013). Contribution of Karnataka university in science & technology: Research output and citation impact during 2001-10. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 33(2).114-24.
Mukherjee, B. (2008). Scholarly Literature from Selected Universities of Delhi and Uttar Pradesh: A Pilot Study. LIBRES: Library & Information Science Research Electronic Journal, 18(1).1-14.
Potter, W.G. (1981). Introduction, Library Trends, 30, 5.
Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 24, 348–349.
Siwach, Anil & Malik, Satish. (2015). Bibliometric Analysis of Research Publications of Maharshi Dayanand University (Rohtak) during 2000-2013. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology. 35. 17-24. 10.14429/djlit.35.1.7789.
MDU (2021). Available at https://mdu.ac.in/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Hak publikasi dan pemanfaatan karya intelektual pada jurnal ini menjadi milik penuh penerbit, sedangkan hak moral menjadi milik penulis.
- Aspek legal formal akses dan pemanfaatan setiap artikel JoDIS tunduk di bawah lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-Berbagi Serupa (CC BY-SA), yang berarti bahwa konten jurnal dapat dimanfaatkan secara bebas dan wajar (fair use) dalam bentuk serupa bahkan untuk kepentingan komersial.
- Untuk menghindari tindakan malpraktik publikasi dan plagiarisme penerbitan artikel, penulis diminta mengisi dan menandatangani pernyataan hak cipta pada Surat Pernyataan Keaslian Naskah dan Copyright Transfer.